| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160921 |
| Uptime | 12.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 27 '17 at 21:57 |
| Run Duration | 87 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.5%
Above average
|
64% 112 Pts
|
33% 241 Pts
|
25% 404 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.8%
Average
|
49% 58.3 fps
|
52% 63 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
116% 153 MB/s
|
81% 0.86 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
35.5%
Below average
|
35% 12.4 GB/s
|
28% 9.63 GB/s
|
41% 98.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 619 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 146x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 130x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 97x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 120x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 85x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 55x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $337 |