Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-V (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '17 at 11:12
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 91 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 420 43% 348 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.52% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 1.44 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 2.96 2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.52% Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 36.9 33% 35.9 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 35.9 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221 10,770 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2320000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 100 349 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 326 (A6) Unknown 100 100 54 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 107 (A9) Unknown 100 100 283 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 98 (AE) Unknown 100 100 22 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 50 100 304942678066 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 813 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 16852 (F1) Unknown 253 253 8600 (F2) Unknown 253 253 6260	66.7% Good	Read 498 Write 330 Mixed 389 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 4.01 70% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 4.12 48% 114 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB 8,831 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 286GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 92 (03) Spinup time 130 130 25788809509 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3492 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 12 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 25780 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1865 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3505 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3505 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 206158757919 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 12 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	43.5% Average	Read 65.8 Write 85.7 Mixed 74.7 57% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.31 86% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 76%
Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB-$70 1,727 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 30GB free Firmware: 3.42 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 54 49 90794372 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3862 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 159 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 485334015 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8328 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1948 (C2) HDA temperature 33 59 8589934625 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 49 90794372 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 14 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 14 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 76 280 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 91 244 9	17.7% Very poor	Read 28 Write 33.4 Mixed 31.4 23% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.25 66% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46 8,198 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 24GB free Firmware: P22OABEA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 129 129 12895125658 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4630 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18237 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2322 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5032 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5032 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 240518365219 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	39.5% Below average	Read 72.7 Write 64.7 Mixed 67 51% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.31 88% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	47.7% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.6 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 16.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	222x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	149x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	39x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	28x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16