| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110815 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 26 '17 at 15:09 |
| Run Duration | 97 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 66% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.1%
Average
|
42% 62.3 Pts
|
16% 123 Pts
|
8% 135 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
|
24.5%
Poor
|
25% 31.4 fps
|
23% 27.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
35.3%
Below average
|
34% 154 MB/s
|
64% 24.6 MB/s
|
19% 35.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
25.1%
Poor
|
26% 8.97 GB/s
|
10% 3.5 GB/s
|
43% 92.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M LE Builds (Compare 109 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 18x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 12x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $139 |