HP CQ2902EFm

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP CQ2902EFm  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AE3
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130125
Uptime14.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '17 at 14:22
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 45.8
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 34
23% 32.3 Pts
4-Core 34.3
8-Core 31.5
4% 32.9 Pts
64-Core 34.2
2% 34.2 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
HP(103C 2AE3) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.7.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.75
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.82 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 101
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.38
91% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.77% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback