Toshiba SATELLITE L875-137

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 75% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L875-137 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130717
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '17 at 06:00
Run Duration	95 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	75%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 82.1 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 93.5 50% 76.1 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 132 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB41) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 5.34 6% 6.18 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 4.77 Splatting 5.7 4% 5.36 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 702GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX003M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1520 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 6397 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 14063 (0A) Spinup retry count 225 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 6210 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1230 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 390 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 92309 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 270583398437 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 71 71 11993 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 190 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	50.2% Above average	Read 90.3 Write 84.5 Mixed 87.9 66% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.15 60% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GB 5,165 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.1% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 18.1 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 12.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE L875-137

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)