Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X79 (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140725
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '17 at 23:15
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 95.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 227 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 708 74% 592 Pts	64-Core 922 57% 922 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85A4) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Lighting 77.8 Reflection 76.7 Parallax 73.9 63% 76.1 fps	MRender 71.3 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 71.7 58% 71 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 374GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,519 Write 1,728 Mixed 1,564 360% 1,604 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 26.1 169% 66.8 MB/s	DQ Read 43 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 31.8 53% 97.3 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 118GB free Firmware: DXM04B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11512 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4210 (B1) Unknown 90 90 348 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 60 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 586 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21778893475	80.7% Excellent	Read 515 Write 371 Mixed 413 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 17.6 119% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.9 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 16.1 28% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4TB free Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 10447 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 440 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 793 (0A) Spinup retry count 108 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 208 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 51 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 534 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 197569282079 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 644 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 205 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	97.3% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 171 Mixed 153 123% 164 MB/s	4K Read 3.85 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.27 230% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 109%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 971GB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 160 Mixed 143 117% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.33 94% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 128%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free, PID 3320 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 98.1 Mixed 69.3 111% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 7.43 4K Mixed 0.49 272% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0 4x8GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.5% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 17.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 55.8 72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	434x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	383x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	296x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	104x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	99x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	77x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	29x
Dominator DHX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 73%, 416 samples	21x
Vengeance DDR3 1866 4x8GBCorsairBench 88%, 441 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $812

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16