PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO (all builds) |
Memory | 14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170613 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 25 '17 at 22:23 |
Run Duration | 272 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
41.9%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
208%
Outstanding
|
|||
73.9%
Very good
|
||||
109%
Outstanding
|
||||
DaneElec MicroUSB 4GB
4GB free, PID 0008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
5.39%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
73.3%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples | 277x |
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 206x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 191x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 193x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 154x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 115x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $867 |