Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
Performance Results
| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170508 |
| Uptime | 1.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 25 '17 at 22:08 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | SAU-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Core i7-3930K
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
76.5%
Very good
|
74% 129 Pts
|
61% 500 Pts
|
49% 787 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
123%
Outstanding
|
135% 183 fps
|
116% 144 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
117% 156 MB/s
|
50% 0.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR3 1600 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26%
Poor
|
23% 8.07 GB/s
|
23% 8.1 GB/s
|
53% 75.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 5 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2665 0IntelBench 67%, 1,061 samples | 2x |
| Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples | 1x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples | 1x |
| GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples | 1x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 10% - Terrible | Total price: $89 |