| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-C (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151019 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 25 '17 at 21:41 |
| Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.4%
Very good
|
76% 132 Pts
|
56% 414 Pts
|
26% 415 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.5.2
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.5%
Below average
|
36% 61.1 fps
|
47% 57.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
62.1%
Good
|
87% 115 MB/s
|
73% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
72.7%
Very good
|
74% 26.1 GB/s
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
57% 70.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,039 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 176x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 146x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 116x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 98x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 89x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 68x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $166 |