Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160316
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '17 at 20:39
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$40 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 194 78% 132 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 300 40% 302 Pts	64-Core 305 19% 305 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F7) CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6.1 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.3% Below average	Lighting 41.2 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 49.5 34% 40.5 fps	MRender 40.6 Gravity 44 Splatting 36.9 33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH4-CE120 120GB 793 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1265 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 209 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 94 94 115 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1048630 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1042	85.5% Excellent	Read 509 Write 394 Mixed 423 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 7.78 105% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 16.3 81% 185 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 170GB free Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 0 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1517 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 33141150 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2145 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1017 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 50 689766436 (C2) HDA temperature 36 50 68719476772 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 27 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 50182397888863 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3709217819 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1076158083	59% Above average	Read 98.8 Write 107 Mixed 73.7 70% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.61 112% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB 8,875 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 40GB free Firmware: PB2OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 201 201 64424509441 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 8613 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 5717 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3449 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 99 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 33961 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 206159282209 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	38.4% Below average	Read 66.1 Write 67.7 Mixed 63.5 50% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.26 71% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB 30,824 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	37.4% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 10.7 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 11.4 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	720x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	479x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	305x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	453x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	392x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	252x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	131x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	128x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $123

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16