Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '17 at 16:08
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 85.9 1-Core 91.2 2-Core 204 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 719 68% 562 Pts	64-Core 893 55% 893 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% XFX(1682 9385) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Lighting 51.5 Reflection 53 Parallax 62.2 42% 55.6 fps	MRender 51.7 Gravity 47.7 Splatting 38.7 37% 46 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223 7,621 User benchmarks, average bench 175% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5809 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2230 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 92 92 236 (AE) Unknown 99 99 111 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 848 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 53 23 47 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 60584 (F1) Unknown 99 99 32172 (F2) Unknown 99 99 71756	165% Outstanding	Read 1,816 Write 990 Mixed 1,252 299% 1,353 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 28.5 87% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 93.4 DQ Write 80.3 DQ Mixed 43.3 44% 72.3 MB/s
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 220%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 839GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 216268433 (03) Spinup time 95 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8813 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 53 52 1580630778836 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14635 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4013 (B7) Unknown 98 98 2 (B8) Unknown 79 79 21 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032856 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 54 588972067 (C2) HDA temperature 35 46 94489280547 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 37 18 216268433 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -94566589897553 (F1) Unknown 100 253 346494846 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1352790227	51.6% Above average	Read 94.4 Write 85.4 Mixed 89.1 68% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.52 114% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 441GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 175 2141 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2367 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3948 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1697 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 133 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2242 (C2) HDA temperature 109 100 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	113% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 217 Mixed 159 138% 184 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.33 104% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 109%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 36GB free Firmware: 04.04V06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 201 199 2933 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4664 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31405 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3404 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 447 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4705 (C2) HDA temperature 113 82 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.9% Average	Read 85.4 Write 84.3 Mixed 77.1 62% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 2.51 4K Mixed 0.68 159% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 3x8GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3 of 8 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.6% Excellent	MC Read 38.6 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 32.7 99% 34.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 18.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	757x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	194x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	113x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	86x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	39x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16