Asus 1215N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus 1215N (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK 1215N
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110505
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '17 at 12:48
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D525-$250 2,196 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	25.3% Poor	Memory 47.3 1-Core 7.4 2-Core 13.7 19% 22.8 Pts	4-Core 21.3 8-Core 23.6 3% 22.5 Pts	64-Core 24.8 2% 24.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 8983 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4803 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 29 (A8) Unknown 100 100 531 (A9) Unknown 100 100 232 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 425 (AE) Unknown 100 100 225 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 59 53 227634184233 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 3600 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 55236 (F1) Unknown 253 253 31358 (F2) Unknown 253 253 21018 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	38.9% Below average	Read 252 Write 149 Mixed 179 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 13.8 58% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 50.3 DQ Write 44.4 DQ Mixed 23.4 24% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 91%
WDC WD25 00BEVT-80A23T0 250GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 99GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 27.6 Write 23.9 Mixed 25.1 32% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.18 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.18 36% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 18%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID null Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 18.4 Write 12.5 Mixed 13.5 18% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 1.4 123% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 1215N Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus 1215N

CPU
Atom D525Intel $250Bench 23%, 2,196 samples	5x

GPU
IONNvidiaBench 1%, 1,623 samples	5x

SSD
PH6-CE240-L1 240GBBench 69%, 312 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16