PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus P9X79-E WS (all builds) |
Memory | 13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8 |
BIOS Date | 20150508 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 25 '17 at 00:13 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | JPN-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel @ 2.30GHz
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
75%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend SSD370S 512GB-$227
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0724D Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
88.5%
Excellent
|
|||
58.1%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
94.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4930KIntel $105Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 47x |
Xeon E5-2697 v2IntelBench 69%, 1,265 samples | 19x |
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 17x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 13x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 10x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $1,230 |