Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite A500 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA KSKAA
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '17 at 18:45
Run Duration	96 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7450-$90 2,755 User benchmarks, average bench 36% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 29.2 2-Core 60.1 37% 53.6 Pts	4-Core 60.4 8-Core 60.5 8% 60.5 Pts	64-Core 60.9 4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230M 2,911 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FF00) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 327.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	2.54% Terrible	Lighting 2.93 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 1.12 2% 2.88 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 3.3 3% 3.54 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.54% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 179 100 179 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 119 (A5) Unknown 100 100 12887916576 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 37 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 6 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 42 180390264868 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 64424509455 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 95 (EA) Unknown 100 100 293 (F1) Unknown 253 253 211 (F2) Unknown 253 253 490 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	46.7% Average	Read 235 Write 175 Mixed 176 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 15.9 73% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 86.2 DQ Mixed 45.8 51% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 97.8 41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	21x
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	20x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	16x

GPU
GeForce GT 230MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,911 samples	40x
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	39x
Mobility Radeon HD 4650ATIBench 3%, 4,405 samples	8x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	36x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	12x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16