| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090225 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 24 '17 at 17:50 |
| Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.9%
Below average
|
38% 54.5 Pts
|
8% 63.6 Pts
|
4% 72.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
EVGA(3842 1561) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 364.72
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
16% 17.3 fps
|
14% 16.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
69.1%
Good
|
90% 119 MB/s
|
170% 1.89 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
16% 5.57 GB/s
|
13% 4.67 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 194 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 55x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 18x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 14x |
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 7x |
| GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |