Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '17 at 04:41
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 152
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 468
44% 366 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1046.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 38.5
25% 34.5 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 40.5
28% 32.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 484
Write 337
Mixed 293
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 13.5
73% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 22
50% 103 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50
148GB free
Firmware: GT001L Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
41% Average
Read 69
Write 73.5
Mixed 8.72
36% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.26
80% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
110GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 98.4
Mixed 14.2
50% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.18
61% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
16GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 78.2
Write 80
Mixed 7.82
40% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.15
64% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
3GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 102
Write 138
Mixed 98.1
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.36
4K Mixed 0.75
207% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback