Supermicro X9DBL-3F/X9DBL-iF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DBL-3F/X9DBL-iF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DBL-3F/X9DBL-iF
Memory123.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '17 at 23:08
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2450 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 45.8
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 175
51% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 641
58% 486 Pts
64-Core 1,586
98% 1,586 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.2% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 56.9
46% 60.2 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 55.6
Splatting 53.5
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X210 512GB-$152
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X210400 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 469
Write 415
Mixed 414
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 24.6
97% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 56.4
66% 117 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 101%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
29GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 24.4
Mixed 16.5
28% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.21
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.57
54% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 33%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
26GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 24.2
Mixed 12.5
26% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.96
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.52
52% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386B4G70DM0-YH94 4x31.8GB
4 of 6 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.9
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DBL-3F/X9DBL-iF Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DBL-3F/X9DBL-iF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback