Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '17 at 20:51
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 154 70% 114 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 655 62% 512 Pts	64-Core 841 52% 841 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% XFX(1682 9385) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Lighting 51.2 Reflection 53.7 Parallax 67.7 42% 57.5 fps	MRender 51.7 Gravity 47.8 Splatting 38.7 37% 46 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223 7,621 User benchmarks, average bench 175% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5783 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2210 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 92 92 234 (AE) Unknown 99 99 108 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 848 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 53 23 47 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 60120 (F1) Unknown 99 99 31908 (F2) Unknown 99 99 71037	177% Outstanding	Read 1,825 Write 1,153 Mixed 1,412 324% 1,464 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 29.8 90% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 57.8 61% 100 MB/s
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 220%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 839GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 75196440 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8773 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 53 52 1580630712915 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14610 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3993 (B7) Unknown 98 98 2 (B8) Unknown 79 79 21 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032856 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 54 572522530 (C2) HDA temperature 34 46 94489280546 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 18 75196440 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 14190571971690 (F1) Unknown 100 253 339666683 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1087544758	57.1% Above average	Read 102 Write 97.1 Mixed 92.6 73% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.55 121% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 370GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 175 2183 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2347 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3921 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1677 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 126 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2229 (C2) HDA temperature 111 100 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70.2% Very good	Read 158 Write 86.2 Mixed 103 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.04 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.35 126% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 109%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 38GB free Firmware: 04.04V06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 201 199 2950 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4644 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 31379 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3384 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 440 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4685 (C2) HDA temperature 115 82 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 39% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 3x8GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3 of 8 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.4% Excellent	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 32.1 98% 34.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 19.5 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	762x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	194x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	114x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16