Asrock Z87 Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z87 Killer (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '17 at 15:35
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	96%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 195 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 319 34% 271 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 120 Parallax 102 94% 113 fps	MRender 96.9 Gravity 103 Splatting 99.6 82% 99.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 233GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4191 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1771 (B1) Unknown 99 99 12 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 42 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 63 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7755588894	87.5% Excellent	Read 503 Write 233 Mixed 355 80% 364 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 25.6 138% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 77.5 113% 214 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 133GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4454 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1152 (B1) Unknown 99 99 27 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 59 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 1 1 4294967217 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5619701017	107% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 491 Mixed 499 112% 503 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 27.7 142% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 84.9 132% 249 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 116%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 101GB free Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4617373 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 -50113678402919 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2643 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 258 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 17724 (BD) vendor-specific 30 76 47249621022 (C2) HDA temperature 30 76 47249621022 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4617373 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4617373 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4617373 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4074 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2907 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2907 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4785	80.9% Excellent	Read 516 Write 189 Mixed 230 68% 312 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 23.1 136% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 43.8 76% 148 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 87%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4962 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1892 (B1) Unknown 93 93 83 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 56 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 157 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23575909577	91.2% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 348 Mixed 331 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 24.2 134% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 19.9 75% 167 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 108%
WD Re 2TB-$54 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01D01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7208 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 945 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 36435 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 923 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 901 (C2) HDA temperature 114 97 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	79.3% Very good	Read 139 Write 137 Mixed 123 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.85 4K Mixed 0.45 130% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 83%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 416GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 112 Write 130 Mixed 104 150% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.65 4K Mixed 0.59 113% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 20,216 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.5% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.6 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z87 Killer Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Killer - $216

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	101x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	96x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	26x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	15x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16