Asus A88XM-E

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-E (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '17 at 12:56
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51 29,887 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 158 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 249 33% 247 Pts	64-Core 248 15% 248 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Asus(1043 04B0) CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6.1 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.9% Below average	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 37.5 Parallax 56.3 30% 43.5 fps	MRender 49 Gravity 46.9 Splatting 45.8 38% 47.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast S800 128G 123GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20150213 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4128 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2011 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 198 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 1 (A4) Unknown 100 100 6991433 (A5) Unknown 100 100 3449 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3397 (A7) Unknown 100 100 3415 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 394 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 225 (F1) Unknown 100 100 738451 (F2) Unknown 100 100 607219	61.3% Good	Read 482 Write 191 Mixed 278 70% 317 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 5.12 84% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 23 55% 116 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 67%
Teleplan TP750G 750GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 394GB free Firmware: GQ201B Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 95 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2123 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3018 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8800 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 3824 (0A) Spinup retry count 160 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1607 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 135524 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 148 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 24459 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 231929806882 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 63 (DE) Loaded hours 96 96 1941 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 304 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	39.8% Below average	Read 69.6 Write 68.9 Mixed 70.4 52% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.19 67% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 50%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 73GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 10 (03) Spinup time 153 146 1350 (04) Start/Stop count 48 48 52278 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6584 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1743 (BF) G-sense error rate 89 89 11 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 369 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 165 165 107324 (C2) HDA temperature 111 96 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	34.3% Below average	Read 60.3 Write 58.7 Mixed 60.8 45% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.24 77% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 61%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 8GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 90 213791607 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9639 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 909048349 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 24407 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6973 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 841 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 49 690094119 (C2) HDA temperature 39 51 107374182439 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 73 54 200382175 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 4 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	28% Poor	Read 59.1 Write 38.2 Mixed 47.3 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.29 81% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 363GB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 31.2 Mixed 7.79 28% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.34 60% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 20%
SAMSUNG SP2514N 250GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 73GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 31.8 Mixed 17.8 34% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.28 50% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	44% Average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 17.1 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 12.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-E Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-E

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	20x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	13x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	31x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	21x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $79

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16