Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	51.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '17 at 12:00
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 61.3 1-Core 76.8 2-Core 152 55% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 573 52% 438 Pts	64-Core 870 54% 870 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.7% Average	Lighting 59.2 Reflection 62.5 Parallax 62.5 48% 61.4 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 65 Splatting 57.7 50% 60.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Areca ARC-1883-VOL#000 18TB 3.5TB free Firmware: R001 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 816GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1399 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 77 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 54 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 57 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1000376903	95.7% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 499 Mixed 512 114% 510 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 74 4K Mixed 27.5 126% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 37.4 59% 113 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 409GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 1,943 Write 1,660 Mixed 1,615 387% 1,739 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 24.8 134% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 36.2 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 24.9 34% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 353%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB 335 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64.9% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 23.1 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 14.4 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 179%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16