| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Precision T5610 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T5610 (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170509 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 22 '17 at 05:58 |
| Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
64.7%
Good
|
58% 95.7 Pts
|
37% 276 Pts
|
17% 278 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.62
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
13% 16.1 fps
|
14% 17.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
112% 501 MB/s
|
103% 38.4 MB/s
|
27% 45.7 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.2%
Very good
|
79% 27.7 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
52% 76.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 687 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 66x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples | 48x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 79x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 38x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 26x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $109 |