Asus X51R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus X51R  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X51R
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '17 at 01:54
Run Duration1245 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Duo T2450
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 19.6
2-Core 38.3
28% 38.1 Pts
4-Core 37.6
8-Core 38.2
5% 37.9 Pts
64-Core 37.4
2% 37.4 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 1100
Asus(1043 1402) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.400.0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.35
0% 0.22 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 85.3
Mixed 58.5
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.18
75% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 61%
Sandisk SD25BI-512 1GB
0GB free
Firmware: HDX 2.15 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.5% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.8
Mixed 0.8
1% 0.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.11
4K Mixed 0.08
24% 0.17 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.2% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 2.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback