Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-M WS (all builds)
Memory	49.8 GB free of 56 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170309
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '17 at 16:24
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 119 2-Core 242 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 771 75% 617 Pts	64-Core 955 59% 955 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 124 Parallax 103 92% 113 fps	MRender 99 Gravity 106 Splatting 106 85% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 1TB 2,597 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 931GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4621 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 42 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 37 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12745693562	104% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 411 Mixed 422 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 46.1 169% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 44.1 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 120 97% 131 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 929GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4498 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 46 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 62 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 166870357	102% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 411 Mixed 415 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 44.5 167% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 44.4 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 103 84% 114 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 2,047 Write 1,955 Mixed 1,843 435% 1,949 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 36.3 178% 66.3 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 141 131% 203 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 363%
HGST Ultrastar He8 Helium 8TB-$94 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1TB free Firmware: A4GNT907 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 108 (03) Spinup time 146 146 38684262852 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2064 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2262 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 19 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2192 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2192 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 223339741215 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.6% Good	Read 120 Write 118 Mixed 110 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.45 160% 1.82 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 56GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95.6% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 33.2 105% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 20.3 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	39x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	23x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	17x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	13x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x

SSD
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $210Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M393A1G40DB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 99%, 225 samples	7x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	6x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $472

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16