Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 53.2 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 174 57% 105 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 635 58% 486 Pts	64-Core 1,619 100% 1,619 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Lighting 15.7 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 18.3 13% 16.1 fps	MRender 20.8 Gravity 14.2 Splatting 16.8 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hds722020ala330 RSD HUA 2TB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: JKAOA31D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 65547 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 104 (03) Spinup time 119 119 51578602086 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 306 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 112 112 39 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 45305 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 279 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 307 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 307 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 317828300832 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64.5% Good	Read 110 Write 115 Mixed 116 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.42 98% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 70%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 1,824 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free Firmware: 1402 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 108 Write 118 Mixed 94.6 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 4.19 4K Mixed 0.43 147% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70... 128GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 29.8 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6.8 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16