PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Ciara Enterprise 7270 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME H270M-PLUS |
Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170418 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 20 '17 at 21:15 |
Run Duration | 84 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
82%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
|
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
59.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 4x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 2x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 1x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $309 |