PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MICRO-STAR MS-7597 |
Motherboard | MSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597) (all builds) |
Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091231 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 20 '17 at 20:19 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 52% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Processor Model Unknown
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
|
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
77%
Very good
|
||||
69%
Good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 7x |
Athlon II X2 245AMDBench 41%, 6,247 samples | 7x |
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |