MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '17 at 17:04
Run Duration409 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 135
61% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 320
35% 276 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
PwrHis(1787 2339) 2GB
CLim: 1160 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.6.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 32
Parallax 34.1
23% 31.4 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 32.8
24% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$75
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 175
Mixed 106
115% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.16
63% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
212GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 70.8
Write 69.8
Mixed 30.8
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.27
93% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
72GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
44% Average
Read 74.4
Write 78.4
Mixed 54.5
52% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.37
106% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
72GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 60.2
Mixed 22.6
34% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.52
120% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
69GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 52.1
Write 54
Mixed 28.2
33% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.29
90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 126
Write 4.47
Mixed 7.49
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.002
46% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.5% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback