Lenovo 3113WDY

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 3113WDY (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 3113WDY
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121011
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '17 at 09:12
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 U 520 253 User benchmarks, average bench 31% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 37.1 1-Core 14.6 2-Core 23.7 18% 25.1 Pts	4-Core 68.7 8-Core 62.5 9% 65.6 Pts	64-Core 68.7 4% 68.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.22% Terrible	Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.23 fps	MRender 0.33 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 0.48 0% 0.33 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.22% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1591 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 901 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 52 (AE) Unknown 100 100 115 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2562 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 39 261993857062 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 7892474107 (F7) Unknown 100 100 246975847 (F8) Unknown 100 100 292177034	32.8% Below average	Read 248 Write 197 Mixed 203 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 6.4 34% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 13.2 DQ Write 20.1 DQ Mixed 6.9 8% 13.4 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 113%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB 234 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 15GB free, PID 0159 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	6.68% Terrible	Read 17.1 Write 15.7 Mixed 16.1 21% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.91 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 13% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.68% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3020EF48E8W1333 2x2GB 858 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 5.6 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 0.4 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 216 18% 216 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 3113WDY

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)