Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 887 588 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 39.3 2-Core 78 27% 58.7 Pts	4-Core 76.9 8-Core 79.3 10% 78.1 Pts	64-Core 70.2 4% 70.2 Pts
Poor: 28% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21FE) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.93% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 0.88 1% 1.06 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.74 1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.93% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB 2,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSLAN102 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 505 Write 455 Mixed 490 108% 483 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 23.9 68% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 61 62% 100 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 90%
1,995 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 14GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	4.89% Terrible	Read 18.2 Write 6.38 Mixed 8.51 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 3.59 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.005 14% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.89% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 2x4GB 2,894 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 9.5 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 8 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 534 8% 534 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 887IntelBench 41%, 588 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	3x

SSD
LCT-128M3S 128GBLiteonitBench 67%, 2,346 samples	2x
MZ7PC128HAFU-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 63%, 715 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	1x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	1x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16