User System

Performance Results


Gaming 123% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 116% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	EVGA Default string
Motherboard	EVGA 131-HE-E095
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '17 at 21:50
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 97 1-Core 133 2-Core 228 88% 153 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 791 72% 604 Pts	64-Core 1,090 68% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2727 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Lighting 195 Reflection 215 Parallax 189 159% 199 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 186 Splatting 147 128% 157 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5411 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 232 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 50 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 64 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7503514813	95.4% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 414 Mixed 416 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 96.8 4K Mixed 26.8 157% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 48.6 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 27 36% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 7GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 22790 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1796 (B1) Unknown 96 96 119 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 46 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 594 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28352698285	83.3% Excellent	Read 517 Write 291 Mixed 363 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 23.7 141% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 36.9 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 24.4 35% 61 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 116%
WD My Book 1235 2TB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 300GB free, PID 1235 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 88.7 Write 120 Mixed 115 146% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.25 85% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 397 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 44.2 MC Write 46.9 MC Mixed 40.8 126% 44 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 25 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 50.3 80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)