Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130823
Uptime	5.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '17 at 21:27
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon Dual Core 5050e 330 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 39.1 1-Core 17.5 2-Core 69.6 25% 42.1 Pts	4-Core 74 8-Core 74.8 10% 74.4 Pts	64-Core 64.2 4% 64.2 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E880) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.99% Terrible	Lighting 6.07 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 3.75 5% 6.18 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 8.57 5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.99% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 11171160 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 -5016521797687 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4001 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 231 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 65 42953932832 (C2) HDA temperature 32 65 42953932832 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11171160 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11171160 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11171160 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5972 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2580 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2580 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2806	27.2% Poor	Read 249 Write 73.2 Mixed 119 32% 147 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 6.62 38% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 40.7 DQ Write 29.3 DQ Mixed 16.8 18% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 69%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 298GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (03) Spinup time 94 94 2860 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9444 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18195 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9348 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 99 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 55 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 57 387186711 (C2) HDA temperature 72 55 471072796 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 383783 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 157 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	56% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 101 Mixed 95.3 73% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.45 115% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 52217, 52217 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 206 19% 206 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	30x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	13x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	43x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16