| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P5B (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20061026 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 19 '17 at 20:46 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 41% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38%
Below average
|
32% 43.7 Pts
|
6% 41.8 Pts
|
2% 40.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon X1650
Asus(1043 01B6) 512MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
|
0.48%
Terrible
|
1% 0.82 fps
| ||
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26.8%
Poor
|
32% 42.4 MB/s
|
60% 0.49 MB/s
| |
|
|
34.4%
Below average
|
33% 44.8 MB/s
|
43% 0.32 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.4%
Very poor
|
12% 4.3 GB/s
|
11% 3.83 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5B Builds (Compare 223 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5B - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 27x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 19x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 17x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $195 |