Fujitsu CELSIUS M470

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M470 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2778-X1
Memory	9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, , ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090714
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '17 at 17:16
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 975-$550 3,143 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 96.2 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 184 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 368 49% 366 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 (SLI Disabled) 1,059 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Nvidia(10DE 0705) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.27% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 8.42 Parallax 5.62 5% 6.62 fps	MRender 8.52 Gravity 8.97 Splatting 6.26 6% 7.92 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.27% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 315 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 194 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1601120672	52.6% Above average	Read 249 Write 196 Mixed 202 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 26.7 85% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 16.7 34% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 115%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 892GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 115 (03) Spinup time 154 154 38675808680 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5359 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6285 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1723 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5386 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5386 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 188979478559 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	55.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 91.1 Mixed 106 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 61%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 843GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 56 (03) Spinup time 137 137 38678036958 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3853 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6288 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1726 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3879 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3879 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 188979478558 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	53.9% Above average	Read 89.5 Write 98.5 Mixed 79.5 67% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.41 87% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 61%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB 946 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 780GB free, PID 0b1a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 27.6 Mixed 25.1 35% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.17 18% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 22.5 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 53.4 75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M470 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M470

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	18x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	7x
Xeon E5540IntelBench 63%, 486 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	3x
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	3x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x
120GB 120GBPolionBench 69%, 14 samples	3x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	2x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	15x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	6x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $292

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16