Asus UX305FA

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus UX305FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK UX305FA
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '17 at 16:15
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	100%
CPU Throttled	80%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y10 478 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Memory 54.5 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 52.7 30% 43.9 Pts	4-Core 77.6 8-Core 101 11% 89.5 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 181D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4312 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	1.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 2.85 Parallax 2.97 2% 2.56 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 2 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.96% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X300s SATA M.2 256GB 785 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2170002 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 1285 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2143 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 44 (A8) Unknown 100 100 75 (A9) Unknown 100 100 816 (AB) Unknown 100 100 1 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 18 (AE) Unknown 100 100 22 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 45 63 270583726135 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 60 (E8) Unknown 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4957 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1713 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1688 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	72.8% Very good	Read 410 Write 356 Mixed 382 85% 383 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 20.9 95% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 47.5 60% 109 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 13.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 7.7 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical UX305FA Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus UX305FA

CPU
Core M-5Y10cIntelBench 44%, 3,050 samples	144x
Core M-5Y10IntelBench 47%, 478 samples	40x
Core M-5Y71IntelBench 45%, 3,052 samples	21x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	205x

SSD
X300s SATA M.2 256GBSanDiskBench 77%, 785 samples	68x
M600 SATA M.2 256GBMicronBench 84%, 2,750 samples	46x
X300s SATA M.2 128GBSanDiskBench 71%, 618 samples	31x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	87x
2x4GBHynixBench 60%, 11,918 samples	41x
2x2GBHynixBench 40%, 7,517 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16