Toshiba SATELLITE C855-2FG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855-2FG (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '17 at 16:13
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 124 58% 93.1 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 190 23% 178 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 429GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 20 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 59 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 124116275
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 134GB free Firmware: AX003M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1739 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1495 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 43 43 22992 (0A) Spinup retry count 129 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1459 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 894 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 46 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 46066 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 249108627494 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 46 46 21638 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 257 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	41.6% Average	Read 70.1 Write 74.8 Mixed 69.1 54% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 57%
ASMT 2115 500GB 2,879 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 59GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 27.8 Mixed 7.19 26% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.12 23% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU5-GN-F HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 18.1 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 17 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE C855-2FG

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)