User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemEXPER ACTIVEDEX162
MotherboardEXPER BAT-I2
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '17 at 14:00
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron J1800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
SC Int 38
SC Float 23
SC Mixed 30.6
24% 30.5 Pts
QC Int 85
QC Float 48.6
QC Mixed 61.2
15% 64.9 Pts
MC Int 81.3
MC Float 48.1
MC Mixed 60.5
10% 63.3 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 16%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 99CF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3
1% 2.83 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.5
1% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$33
283GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 95.1
Mixed 93.8
73% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.45
86% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $325Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $117
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $57HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback