User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.63%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemDIODE MS-7255
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-7255 V2.0
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070817
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '17 at 12:52
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AND-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron D 3.20GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
6.63% Terrible
SC Int 8.7
SC Float 4.5
SC Mixed 13.1
7% 8.77 Pts
QC Int 29.2
QC Float 25.3
QC Mixed 28.4
6% 27.6 Pts
MC Int 36.6
MC Float 22.7
MC Mixed 25.3
4% 28.2 Pts
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$26
64GB free
Firmware: PF2OA6EA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 46.6
Write 44.8
Mixed 23.2
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.35
95% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 32%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
381GB free, PID a20c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 23.6
Mixed 19.3
30% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.17
71% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.65% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1.3
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 354
11% 354 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $198Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $263Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $56HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback