User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.99%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemDIODE MS-7255
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-7255 V2.0
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070817
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '17 at 12:48
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AND-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron D 3.20GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.99% Terrible
SC Int 35.7
SC Float 7.7
SC Mixed 7.1
14% 16.8 Pts
QC Int 27.4
QC Float 12.6
QC Mixed 24.9
5% 21.6 Pts
MC Int 36.2
MC Float 24.3
MC Mixed 31.3
5% 30.6 Pts
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$20
64GB free
Firmware: PF2OA6EA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 46.3
Write 45.3
Mixed 23.5
28% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.33
85% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 32%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
381GB free, PID a20c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 25.1
Mixed 22.2
32% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.18
69% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.09% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 282
14% 282 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $138
Intel Core i5-8600K $222AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback