Asrock FM2A88M-HD+

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	63.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150505
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '17 at 05:29
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105 8,721 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 77.7 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 149 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 247 33% 246 Pts	64-Core 248 15% 248 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2039 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Lighting 78.7 Reflection 81.6 Parallax 70.7 64% 77 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 78.3 62% 74.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 201 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 354 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 56 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 53 53 47123 (EB) Unknown 99 99 141 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2270069336	97.2% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 396 Mixed 416 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 39.5 145% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 84.4 89% 148 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 124%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 55GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4772099 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 -60644938200230 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2428 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 480 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 34 49 77312622626 (C2) HDA temperature 34 49 77312622626 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4772099 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4772099 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4772099 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8200 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5457 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5457 (F2) Unknown 0 0 16933	74.9% Very good	Read 500 Write 202 Mixed 277 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 23 115% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 54.1 78% 146 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 87%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 100 19999176 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 62 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 894578 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 53 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 43 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 60 622919716 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 198 (C2) HDA temperature 36 40 124554051620 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -65171833749452 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1005761542 (F2) Unknown 100 253 707356954	90.5% Outstanding	Read 129 Write 185 Mixed 76.5 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 5.38 4K Mixed 0.53 183% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 110%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 176 5675 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6375 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15889 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3839 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 590 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 176 176 73349 (C2) HDA temperature 113 105 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 57083 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.9% Above average	Read 86.2 Write 94.6 Mixed 66.4 62% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.19 78% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 83%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 920GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 188 179 5575 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3626 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10308 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3396 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 461 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6641 (C2) HDA temperature 113 106 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 117 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	77.2% Very good	Read 183 Write 85.7 Mixed 101 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.17 75% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 848GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 185 178 5708 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6437 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17112 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4118 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 533 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 174 174 80308 (C2) HDA temperature 111 105 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 18 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	72.1% Very good	Read 150 Write 102 Mixed 86.8 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.24 78% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.1% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 15.9 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.1 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88M-HD+ Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ - $67

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	10x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	10x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	5x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	5x

SSD
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 2,884 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 5,300 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $323

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16