Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '17 at 09:38
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 675
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 157
Parallax 146
126% 152 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 143
Splatting 112
100% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 960GB
726GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 969
Write 954
Mixed 858
207% 927 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 21.9
102% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 13.3
54% 110 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 135%
Great: 291%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
462GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 528
Write 495
Mixed 508
114% 510 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 34.7
113% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 134
108% 144 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,971
Write 1,287
Mixed 1,484
350% 1,581 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 28
131% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 23
58% 114 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 204%
Great: 241%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 82.3
Write 19.4
Mixed 25.1
42% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.19
4K Mixed 0.08
11% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 29.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $596
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback