Hp-pavilion NY604AA-ABA 300-1017

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion NY604AA-ABA 300-1017 (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON JESSE
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '17 at 00:06
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 235e 675 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 32.7 2-Core 70.5 42% 60.9 Pts	4-Core 69.2 8-Core 57.9 9% 63.5 Pts	64-Core 68.8 4% 68.8 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2A8E) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.38 1% 0.87 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 1.35 1% 0.85 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 64 80539958 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 513 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 53145248 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13018045874848 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 223 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 34360262677 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 58 437518362 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 651 (C2) HDA temperature 26 42 64424509466 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -138177687846254 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4594563067 (F2) Unknown 100 253 7479560663 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	45.8% Average	Read 87.8 Write 72.2 Mixed 9.39 41% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.17 4K Mixed 0.39 52% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 70%
Kingston DT 101 G2 16GB 1,946 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 13GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	5.91% Terrible	Read 20 Write 9.18 Mixed 7.03 13% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.22 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.008 16% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.91% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.2 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 7.7 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion NY604AA-ABA 300-1017

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)