Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7700-$100 1,898 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Memory 48.2 1-Core 22 2-Core 30.5 24% 33.6 Pts	4-Core 33.2 8-Core 39.3 5% 36.2 Pts	64-Core 46.9 3% 46.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600-XT 296 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Apple(106B 0083) 256MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 4.42 Parallax 2.53 2% 2.97 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 4.52 2% 2.62 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 2.4 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T7700Intel $100Bench 37%, 1,898 samples	12x
Core2 Duo T7300Intel $90Bench 34%, 2,712 samples	11x
Core2 Duo T9500Intel $125Bench 39%, 996 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 296 samples	13x
Mobility Radeon HD 2400-XTATIBench 1%, 414 samples	11x
Radeon HD 2600 XTATIBench 1%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
hynix SC210 2.5 7MM 128GBSKBench 61%, 978 samples	2x
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	1x

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $138

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16