Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '17 at 19:57
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 428
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 62.4
57% 67.7 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 54.8
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 186
Write 103
Mixed 125
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 8.92
79% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 7.73
21% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39%
Great: 61%
WD Re 2TB-$54
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01D02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 143
Write 148
Mixed 141
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.87
4K Mixed 0.53
150% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 83%
WD Elements 1TB
205GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 72.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 68.1
95% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.17
65% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 43%
Sony Storage Media 32GB
11GB free, PID 09c2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 125
Write 13.9
Mixed 12.7
42% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.47
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.02
33% 2.84 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.4% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 25.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $701
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback