| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q PRO TURBO (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121008 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 14 '17 at 03:12 |
| Run Duration | 350 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.3%
Above average
|
49% 76.4 Pts
|
27% 199 Pts
|
12% 200 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.9.2
|
20.1%
Poor
|
18% 27.9 fps
|
24% 29 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
75.1%
Very good
|
45% 205 MB/s
|
140% 47.1 MB/s
|
94% 153 MB/s
|
|
|
54.5%
Above average
|
60% 80.7 MB/s
|
117% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
0GB free, PID 008f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
6.72%
Terrible
|
10% 10.7 MB/s
|
47% 1.65 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.8%
Poor
|
21% 7.4 GB/s
|
21% 7.37 GB/s
|
48% 83.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q PRO TURBO Builds (Compare 106 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q PRO TURBO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 18x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 16x |
| Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 9x |
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 8x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $501 |