Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E754

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E754 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB26F
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140926
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '17 at 08:18
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4712MQ 5,324 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29.4% Poor	Memory 43.4 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 49.5 26% 39.2 Pts	4-Core 83.6 8-Core 274 19% 179 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fujitsu(10CF 17AA) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 3.59 2% 3.08 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.13 3% 3.58 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GB 878 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0200Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6558 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 908 (B1) Unknown 97 97 97 (B3) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 54 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15616845803 (F2) Unknown 99 99 13040260979	39.9% Below average	Read 481 Write 105 Mixed 165 54% 250 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 8.36 36% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 83.4 DQ Write 73.8 DQ Mixed 22.4 32% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB 30,873 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	44.9% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 15.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 7.7 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical LIFEBOOK E754 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E754

CPU
Core i5-4300MIntel $264Bench 51%, 13,678 samples	47x
Core i7-4712MQIntelBench 62%, 5,324 samples	28x
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 51%, 15,981 samples	27x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	170x

SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GBSamsungBench 75%, 878 samples	15x
MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 1,578 samples	11x
MZ7TE128HMGR-00004 128GBSamsungBench 66%, 696 samples	7x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	26x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	16x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $264

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16