Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '17 at 02:47
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 91.8 1-Core 131 2-Core 262 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 712 76% 607 Pts	64-Core 713 44% 713 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.66 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.91 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 71 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 66 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 95682613	96% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 414 Mixed 416 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 47.3 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 27.2 160% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 47.9 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 26.3 35% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 654GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 197 194 3056 (03) Spinup time 163 148 8841 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1973 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4919 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 883 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 785 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 193 193 23646 (C2) HDA temperature 125 101 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 168 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 153 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 198 227	49.3% Average	Read 88.6 Write 83.4 Mixed 74.2 62% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.12 48% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 447GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 90 65536 (02) Throughput performance 136 100 95 (03) Spinup time 119 100 17192517823 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 858 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2739 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 808 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 44 44 65592 (BC) Unknown 100 96 1416 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 57 454819868 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 858 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 858 (C2) HDA temperature 214 139 184684642332 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	73.7% Very good	Read 129 Write 128 Mixed 125 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.34 93% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 76%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 135GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 129 126 4516 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2296 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8141 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1634 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 323 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2296 (C2) HDA temperature 114 96 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	50.8% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 85.7 Mixed 69.1 61% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.36 98% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Avexir DDR4-2666 CL15 4GB 4x4GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.8% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 23.2 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 22.3 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	995x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	252x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,163

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16