Beelink BT7

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Beelink BT7 (all builds)
Motherboard	AMI Cherry Trail FFD
Memory	0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '17 at 19:32
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 2,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	27.3% Poor	Memory 47 1-Core 15.4 2-Core 33.9 23% 32.1 Pts	4-Core 47.9 8-Core 42.3 6% 45.1 Pts	64-Core 48.8 3% 48.8 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.3% Terrible	Lighting 1.57 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 2.06 1% 1.58 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.3% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PowerSSD 64GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 59GB free Firmware: O1229A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 295 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 130 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 1 (A4) Unknown 100 100 6714 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 3 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 162 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5878 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1084 (F5) Unknown 100 100 6015	31.8% Below average	Read 253 Write 101 Mixed 146 36% 167 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 3.74 45% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 75.8 DQ Write 56.9 DQ Mixed 19.2 27% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 88%
Toshiba 064G70 63GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 151 Write 95.8 Mixed 116 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 7.76 51% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 37.6 DQ Mixed 8.24 13% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x2GB 7,517 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 1.5 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Beelink BT7

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)