Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V GENE (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121109
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '17 at 11:26
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 96.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 87% 153 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 482 64% 482 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 1808 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Lighting 115 Reflection 122 Parallax 110 94% 116 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 105 Splatting 96.7 82% 100 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 81GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2493 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 753 (B1) Unknown 98 98 30 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 42 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 38 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13378933990	80.3% Excellent	Read 381 Write 300 Mixed 309 73% 330 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 33.6 121% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 126 118% 186 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4440 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1351 (B1) Unknown 90 90 116 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 51 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 7 (EB) Unknown 99 99 347 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29457404906
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
KingFast 32GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 19GB free Firmware: KFS03005 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 19 (A0) Unknown 100 100 192 (A1) Unknown 100 100 21 (A2) Unknown 100 100 9 (A3) Unknown 100 100 3 (A4) Unknown 100 100 7035 (A5) Unknown 100 100 65 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 14 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044577328 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 32 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 0 0 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1400 (F2) Unknown 100 100 297	56.7% Above average	Read 191 Write 5.84 Mixed 6.86 49% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.74 4K Write 0.72 4K Mixed 0.59 234% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 67%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72 6,221 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 44GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 245 Write 27.8 Mixed 14.6 77% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 0.23 4K Mixed 4.09 186% 5 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61.8% Good	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.3 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 20.1 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 53.1 75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	331x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	187x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	29x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	22x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16