Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 10 '17 at 21:09
Run Duration429 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 141
60% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 362
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.6.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 59.1
38% 45.7 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 45.8
Splatting 38.4
31% 38 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
3TB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 145
Mixed 115
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.19
74% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
214GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 120
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.27
78% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 83.5
Write 110
Mixed 110
77% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
101GB free
Firmware: CC4A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 83.2
Write 75.8
Mixed 79.9
60% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.44
79% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 111
Write 97.5
Mixed 85
122% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.27
4K Mixed 0.6
239% 2.79 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57%
Great: 56%
Audio Player 8GB
3GB free, PID 5668
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.88% Terrible
Read 7.71
Write 4.34
Mixed 5.48
7% 5.84 MB/s
4K Read 3.22
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
13% 1.09 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 13.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback